Historic Vote Shapes Future of Aiken’s Hitchcock Stables

Historic Clash in Aiken Over Hitchcock Stables’ Future

Aiken’s history took center stage on December 17 as the Design Review Board met to discuss the future of the iconic Hitchcock Stables. The atmosphere was charged, and the stakes were high as board members and community members voiced their opinions regarding whether these historic equestrian facilities should be added to the city’s historic register.

A Close Call

In a dramatic vote, the board approved the recommendation to add the Hitchcock Stables to the historic register, with a narrow margin of 4-3. The meeting was packed with impassioned stakeholders, including current property owners, potential buyers, and local history advocates, all weighing in on the significance and future of the beloved stables.

Board Chairwoman Faith Hawks, who had submitted the application in early November, faced criticism for supposedly having a conflict of interest. Lawyers for the current owners, Charlie and Tara Bostwick, and potential future owners, Kevin and Brittany Kisner, argued that Hawks should have recused herself from voting after submitting the application.

What’s the Big Deal?

The stables have historical roots tied to two of Aiken’s prominent families, the Hitchcocks and the Bostwicks. It is believed that they were constructed around 1900, thanks to Thomas Hitchcock Sr., who brought polo to Aiken. Yet, despite the stables’ rich history, they have never been officially recognized—until now!

Hawks defended her actions, stating that her decision was purely a recommendation and not a final ruling. “I consulted with our city prosecutor,” she explained, maintaining that her involvement followed legal guidelines.

Delays and Disputes

The debate heated up as Bostwick and Kisner representatives argued that the board should have addressed the Kisners’ application before considering the Hitchcock Stables’ historic designation. The Kisners had sought to demolish part of the stables, and according to legal counsel, the board’s current move could infringe upon their rights. Their legal team pointed out that state laws prevent changing the regulatory framework in the midst of any ongoing planning process.

After hearing extensive public comment, the board was still split. While some voiced their approval of the historic designation, others, including board members Lott and McMichael, argued that adding the stables didn’t fulfill any pressing need. They emphasized the importance of first addressing the Kisner’s application.

Community Support and Opposition

The public comment section featured a diverse lineup, showcasing a community deeply invested in the issue. Sixteen people spoke out, with many against the recommendation. Pat Cunning and Catherine Stumbert were among those voicing their dissent. In contrast, supporters like Luis Rinaldini championed the stables’ historic recognition, emphasizing their cultural value.

Next Steps

As the board moved forward with the recommendation, the next phase will involve the Aiken Planning Commission. They are set to review the matter at their upcoming meeting on January 14, 2025. If they take action, the Aiken City Council will ultimately make a final call on whether to add the Hitchcock Stables to the historic register.

With everything hanging in the balance, Aiken’s residents eagerly await the next chapter in this historical saga, pondering what the future may hold for the storied Hitchcock Stables.