Dr. Edward Simmer’s Nomination Faces Opposition in South Carolina

News Summary

Dr. Edward Simmer’s nomination to lead the South Carolina Department of Public Health has encountered significant resistance, with the Senate Medical Affairs Committee voting against him. This marks a dramatic shift from his prior confirmation and reflects ongoing concerns about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite previous successes, the backlash over vaccine support and pandemic management has colored perceptions of Simmer. Support from Governor McMaster highlights the contentious debate as the situation develops, emphasizing the intersection of health and politics in the state.

Columbia, South Carolina – Turbulent Waters as Dr. Edward Simmer’s Nomination Faces Stiff Opposition

In a surprising turn of events that has ignited conversations across the state, Dr. Edward Simmer’s nomination to become the first director of the South Carolina Department of Public Health has hit a snag. The South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Committee held a vote on April 3, 2025, and the outcome was a resounding 5-12 against recommending Simmer for the position. This unfortunate news comes despite Simmer’s previous confirmation to head the state’s public health and environmental agency back in 2021, where he received an overwhelming 40-1 vote in favor.

So, what led to this dramatic shift? Well, it seems that the ongoing resentment toward Simmer regarding his management of the COVID-19 pandemic has cast a long shadow over his nomination. Ironically, while Simmer was initially applauded for his leadership when he helped improve South Carolina’s public health ranking from 45th to 37th, the very pandemic that tested his abilities is now being cited as a reason for the backlash. During his tenure at the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), he effectively pushed for initiatives that aimed to ramp up public health standards, but the pandemic has shifted perceptions significantly.

One of the most notable criticisms against Simmer has been his support for the COVID-19 vaccine. He often sported a mask for *protection*, even after many others had discarded theirs. Some naysayers referred to him as a “double masker,” accusing him of pushing vaccine mandates—a claim Simmer has categorically denied, insisting that decisions surrounding public health should be made at a local level, respecting individual freedoms.

The atmosphere during the committee hearing was charged with palpable tension. Audience members arrived brandishing stickers that displayed Simmer’s face crossed out, signaling a strong opposition to his nomination. Lawmakers took turns confronting Simmer verbally, questioning the state’s COVID vaccine rollout and raising concerns regarding the safety of vaccines that have already received federal approval. It’s clear that the aftermath of the pandemic has not only marred perceptions of Simmer but has also left a void of trust in public health institutions that he plans to address if given the role.

Furthermore, Simmer revealed that the process has not been without its threats. He mentioned instances of vandalism directed towards him as part of the mounting pressures surrounding his nomination. Yet, amidst all this, he remains steadfast in his commitment to tackling pressing health issues in South Carolina, such as tackling infant mortality rates and addressing the ongoing challenges of drug overdoses. His vision includes increasing outreach initiatives and collaborating closely with communities to address local health concerns.

In a supportive corner, Governor Henry McMaster publicly voiced his backing for Simmer, alleging that many of the criticisms leveled against the nominee are rooted in misinformation. The debate continues, however, as the full Senate could still cast a vote on Simmer’s nomination even after this unfavorable committee decision.

To top it off, the committee has scheduled an additional meeting to continue questioning Simmer, as time constraints left several queries unanswered during the initial hearing. Even as the political waters remain tumultuous, the resilience of both Simmer and his supporters shines through in their ongoing commitment to public health reform in South Carolina.

As this story evolves, it emphasizes that the intersection of health and politics can often lead to unexpected challenges. Whether Dr. Simmer will eventually secure his position as the director remains to be seen, but one thing is for sure: the conversation around public health continues to be as essential now as it has ever been.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

• The State
• Associated Press
• SC Daily Gazette
• WIS TV
• Charleston City Paper
• Wikipedia: COVID-19 pandemic
• Google Search: South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
• Google Scholar: Edward Simmer
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Public Health
• Google News: Edward Simmer